The end cap or cubic pyramid symmetry in fig 8 of Bk1 chap 2 for up and down symmetry can only be correct if symmetry breaking can be maintained in the expressions for the µ-pseudo neutrinos.

Internally (µ_{nxx }e_{x} – µ_{cxx }e_{x}) to extern pair of (e_{n} and e_{c}) positive charge. Or: Internally (µ_{cxx} e_{x} – µ_{nxx} e_{x}) to extern pair of (e_{c} and e_{n}) negative.

It means that the about that about N_{e} = 3.81 10^{5} external (Bk1 chap 6) e-pseudo neutrinos are involved for a free electron of m_{e} rest mass. Then supposedly the two internal µ-pseudos of 0.5 m_{e} cannot have this rest mass. The exact energy of 0.5 m_{e} is only valid if no external mediation with e-pseudos is considered. N_{e} is normalized to with respect to c-velocity.

The above asymmetry in the expressions for the electron is given by the fine structure constant in which the ratio of 1/ 137.036 determines the virtual photon induction to maintain the electric charge at any moment of exchange with the external e-pseudos. Since the symmetry breaking for up and down part has to be equal, both part contribute with N_{e} interactions to the unit electric charge. Meaning the net result of all internal accelerations is the sum of accelerations vector components of the e-pseudos contributing to the unit charge.

In conclusion the first order deviation of up and down contribution to the charge is {(1/ 137.036) N_{e} = 2783} interactions while the second order deviation involves at least (137.036)^{2} interactions to be shared over e_{c} and e_{n} as external e-pseudo neutrinos. Make the supposition that the µ_{c} (down) in above expression can be an exact replica image expressed in e_{c}-pseudos. So replacing u_{c }by half of N_{e} pseudos of e_{c} kind while the first order of 2783 interactions is used for electric charge generation shared over up and down in anti phase and of the nature of e_{n} kind(up). Consequently either one µ_{n}– or µ_{c}– pseudo determines the polarity of the electric charge. Since only one µ-kind of pseudo neutrino could be real in up and down symmetry in Newtonian space, this set up alternates.

Further since ½N_{e} /137.036^{2} = 10.26 it determines that the replica geometry repeats itself in the overall cycle while ½N_{e}/ 144^{2} = 9.2 nodes with respect to the 0.5m_{e }pseudo µ-cavity. The exchange of the first order group in e-pseudos should follow these nodes in which the phase deviates slightly from the 180^{o} cycle for the up and down alternation. (144 is typical for zero mass of the e-pseudos at c velocity)

As could be guessed the restriction to virtual photon exchange is that the groups velocity of e-pseudos seems never to exceed the relativistic ratio of m/ m_{o} = 144/ 137.036 = 1.050818 with β = 0.307217 c as maximum groups velocity due to accumulated mass energy of the e-pseudo strings, internally. To cast above model of lateral reasoning in a quantum mechanical calculation is complicated considering above geometry.

For the free proton similar lateral reasoning could be expected. Here the end cap symmetry in of Fig 6 Bk1 chap 2 for the 17^{th} quark string expressed in 3τ-pseudo of 108/ 102.777 =1.050818 with τ = 34.259m_{e} , can be seen as a conjugated replica(down) in e-pseudos alternating with the end cap in τ (up) then distributing e_{n} and e_{c}-pseudos for electric charge formation and counterbalancing the end cap geometry. For an educated guess {(108 – 102.777) = 5.223} N_{e} interactions with 4-pseudos are involved.

Note, the idea of the replica geometry is only a means to understand above. It has to be thrashed because in the following the concept of zero energy for e-pseudo neutrinos is made plausible. So the lower half in the fig above has to be real internally as a µ- pseudo geometry of 0.5 m_{e} .

*Electron in A4 bl electron *